A retrospective cohort study of differential attainment, COVID and Chaos: taking the difference out of a terrible trinity.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate Core Surgical Training (CST) differential attainment related to COVID-19, gender, and ethnicity. The hypothesis was that COVID-19 adversely influenced CST outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 271 anonymised CST records was undertaken at a UK Statutory Education Body. Primary effect measures were: Annual Review of Competency Progression Outcome (ARCPO), Membership of the Royal College of Surgeons (MRCS) examination pass, and Higher Surgical Training National Training Number (NTN) appointment. Data was collected prospectively at ARCP and analysed with non-parametric statistical methods in SPSS®. RESULTS: CSTs numbering 138 completed training pre- and 133 peri-COVID. ARCPO 1,2&6 were 71.9% pre- vs. 74.4% peri-COVID (P=0.844). MRCS pass rates were 69.6% pre- versus 71.1% peri-COVID (P=0.968) but NTN appointment rates diminished (pre- 47.4% vs. peri- 36.9%, P=0.324); none of the above varied by gender or ethnicity. Multivariable analyses by three models revealed: ARCPO was associated with gender (m: f 1:0.87, OR 0.53, P=0.043) and CST theme (Plastics vs. General OR 16.82, P=0.007); MRCS pass with theme (Plastics vs. General OR 8.97, P=0.004); NTN with the Improving Surgical Training run-through program (OR 5.00, P<0.001). Program retention improved peri-COVID (OR 0.20, P=0.014) with pan University Hospital rotations performing better than Mixed or District General-only rotations (OR 6.63, P=0.018). CONCLUSION: Differential attainment profiles varied 17-fold, yet COVID-19 did not influence ARCPO or MRCS pass rates. NTN appointment fell by one fifth peri-COVID, but overall training outcome metrics remained robust despite the existential threat.

Prognostic significance of competition ratios in surgical specialty training selection.

BACKGROUND: A competition ratio (CR) indicates the ratio of total applications for a training post when compared with numbers of specialty posts available. This study aimed to evaluate CRs' influence on National Training Number (NTN) selection in a single UK Statutory Education Body. METHODS: Consecutive core surgical trainees numbering 154 (105 men, 49 women; median years since graduation: four) were studied over a 6-year period. Annual specialty specific CRs were obtained from Health Education England's website, and primary outcome measure was UK NTN appointment. RESULTS: Overall NTN appointment was 45.5%. Median CR was 2.36; range Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 0.70 (2020) to Neurosurgery 22.0 (2020). Multivariable analysis revealed that NTN success was associated with: CR (OR 0.46, p=0.003), a single scientific publication (OR 6.25, p=0.001), cohort year (2019, OR 12.65, p=0.003) and Universal Annual Review of Competence Progression Outcome 1 (OR 45.24, p<0.001). CRs predicted NTN appointment with a Youden index defined critical ratio of 4.42; 28.6% (n=8) versus 49.2% (n=62), p=0.018. CONCLUSION: CRs displayed 30-fold variation, with CRs below 4.42 associated with twofold better NTN promotion, but strong clinical competence and academic reach again emerged as the principal drivers of career advancement.

Surgical training salvage during COVID-19: a hospital quality perspective

Introduction Vicissitudes including re-deployment, elective cancellations, and remote educational events have restricted training opportunities during the COVID pandemic. This study aimed to analyse COVID's impact on global Higher Surgical Trainee (HST) performance metrics including hospital adaptability and variance. Materials and Method Intercollegiate Surgical Curriculum Programme (ISCP) portfolios of 50 HSTs (median age 36 (range 29–46) yr., female 15, male 35), including 191 six-month rotational placements, were analysed over two years (March 2019 to 2021). Primary effect measures were: operative logbook numbers, index procedures validated against curriculum requirements and Work Based Assessments (WBA). Results During COVID-19, operative experience per placement declined 26.1% (median 211 vs. 156, p<0.010), with a 32.1% decline in trainee primary surgeon experience (162 vs. 110, p<0.010). Regarding index procedures: cholecystectomy declined 45.5% (11 vs. 6, p=0.027) and inguinal hernia 62.5% (8 vs. 3, p<0.010). WBAs were similar (17 vs. 13, p=0.364). Despite relative equivalence before COVID, median total number of operative procedures performed in District General Hospitals (DGH, n=65) were 40.9% fewer than Tertiary Hospitals (TH, n=110, p<0.010). Radar plots of composite metrics ranged from 11.1 to 75.6% coverage before (p=0.011) vs. 13.3 to 68.9% after COVID (p=0.015). Discussion Hospital training metrics varied over five-fold, a difference likely amplified by COVID, with THs more adaptable to existential shared lessons.